Held: The appeal was allowed and the convictions were quashed. Negative) about Bad Samaritan Laws [2000] Santa Clara Law Review 971, R v Gibbins and Proctor (1918) 13 Cr App R 134. However, it was, and has still not, been made clear by the courts where the employers duty will end on each shift. Case: R v Gibbins and Proctor (1918) Topics. courts have recognized relationships between spouses Smith (1979)[6], here it should be noted We believe that human potential is limitless if you're willing to put in the work. The main issue in the case of R v Gibbins and Proctor (1919) 13Cr App R 134 : Above all, the question was whether or not murder by omission could occur? This conviction seems again slightly strange as although the accused didnt actually do anything, she was still held liable as she was failed to help the old woman and didnt give her anything to help her live through the illness and also failed to seek out medical help for the aunt. nurse who switches off a ventilator commits an act? Thus, he was guilty for omitting to report his son to the police. since the passing of the Human Rights Act 1998 the courts need to take this These laws range from imposing a duty to rescue someone in peril to imposing a duty to act to prevent a crime. omission should constitute the actus reus The failure to act constituted actus reus. Held: The appeal was allowed. Child died of starvation. He went back to the house he had been staying in and fell asleep on a mattress with a lighted cigarette in his hand. in a discussion of some of the ways by which such duty is being imposed. by which a duty to act is being imposed. In this case, the defendants took in Stones sister, to care for her. Case: R v Gibbins and Proctor (1918) | Law | tutor2u Topics Case: R v Gibbins and Proctor (1918) If a parent, or stepparent acting as 'loco parentis' fails to adequately care and provide for a child this may form the actus reus of a criminal offence where the child comes to harm, as they owe the child a duty of care. Held: The Divisional Court held that Ds failure to tell her of the needle could amount to the actus reus for the purposes of an assault causing actual bodily harm (ABH). Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like R v Dytham, Stone and Dobinson, R v Gibbins and Proctor and more. The most recent example of the Miller principle is the case of Evans[9], in which the principle Help center. Here, the parents were under a duty to protect the child and thus were guilty of murder through their omission after the assumption of responsibility. The defendants were convicted of the murder of Gibbinss daughter Nelly, a girl of seven. the appellant Stone; she was occupying a room in his house; Mrs Dobinson had He stood by whilst a bouncer kicked a man to death. liability should be imposed for an omission to act. Citations: [1891] 64 LT 594; [1891] 55 JP 616. In some of the cases mentioned above, particularly those where people have sat back and allowed their family members to die from neglect, there can be no doubt that the severity of a criminal conviction is deserved. 74(2) Journal of Criminal Law 163, 164. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas. liability for homicide offences: Reconciling R v Kennedy with R v Evans (2010) Facts: The defendant (D) was a consultant gynaecologist who omitted to inform a hospital that certain patients referred by him for treatment were private patients. Facts: The defendant (D) lived with her aunt, who was suddenly taken ill with gangrene in her leg and became unable either to feed herself or to call for help. Community . This duty of care means that if you create a dangerous situation, you are liable for any harm caused if you have not taken reasonable steps to prevent the harm occurring. The land was left vacant for many years. Match. AG's Ref (No.3 of 1994) (1997) realise BP was about to walk into the street? This D said no, but when the police officer put her hands in his pockets she was injured by a needle which caused bleeding. Basically this statement means that a crime can be committed if the person is in a particular situation such as drink driving or if they dont have a certificate of M.O.T. Perhaps the most unclear criminalisation of omissions comes in the form of voluntary assumptions of duty. Lord Coleridge CJ wrote that despite the lack of statute or precedent, it would be "a slur on justice" were Ds behaviour to go unpunished. The clinicians treating her re unwilling to stop her treatment in light of the inevitable consequences of the action. However, he was not conscious and had no hope of recovery. omissions [21]. an act contrary to s1 of the Protection From Eviction Act 1977). Textbook of Criminal Law (3rd edn, Sweet and Maxwell 2012), Jonathan Herring, Criminal Law: Text, Cases and Materials Take a look at some weird laws from around the world! It is essential for this matter to consider His subsequent failure to do so created liability for the damage caused. Omissions liability for homicide offences: Reconciling R v Kennedy with R v The family had sufficient funds to support all residing within the house, but Nelly was deliberately starved which caused her death. He claimed the reward. The last of the three main parts of an actus reus is a state of affairs. . There is no legal obligation on one brother to maintain another, so as to make the omission indictable. Test. Match. D stabbed his wife, V, who was later placed on a life support machine. Criminal Law. absence of a duty to actif there is an act, someone acts; but if there is an Held: D was found to be not guilty. Flashcards. Evans (2010) 74(4) Journal of Criminal Law 310, 317. In R v Gibbins and Proctor, [11] the first defendant left his wife and brought his children with him to live with the second defendant. D then left without calling for assistance or summoning an ambulance. This critique is very accurate, as the Mrs B, therefore, applied to the High Court for a declaration that she had the requisite capacity to refuse treatment. Includes stepparent; this is a continuing duty once adopted (Gibbins v Proctor, Stone and Dobinson). First and 2.1 Class answers to learn structuring problem and essay questions. D argued at the time of the actus reus, the driving onto the foot, he lacked the mens rea of any offence since it was purely accidental. Gibbins gave wages to Proctor to provide. -Legal Principle: Both convicted of murder, intentional omission satisfied AR of murder. Held: This will not be an assault or an imprisonment; D was not guilty by omission. This is most evident in professions which involve caring for others such as health professionals. Disclaimer: This essay has been written by a law student and not by our expert law writers. demonstrated by the decision in the case of R v Dytham[2]. serious objections to a This is a tentative argument, as the defendant had no prior relationship with the woman. creation of the danger which leads to the end result. Proctor was also acting as a parent as in reality she was undertaking the role of the childs mother. In 1955 the claimant (C) acquired a plot of land with a view to building a road diversion. [2] In all other circumstances, there is generally no duty to act, even when it would be morally reprehensible to fail to do so. It is submitted this argument is overly cautious in its unwillingness to criminalise an omission, suggesting that parents caring for infants do not have a duty to know when to call for medical help. Under the legislation in force then, the appellant was liable to pay compensation, whether or not it was caused by negligence or by accident. Significant Constitutional Principles in the UK. She was poorly cared for and developed infected bedsores as a result of her condition. However, as Williams argues a In R v Miller,[8] the House of Lords found the defendant guilty of arson by omission. criminal liability or non-liability should turn on such fine points, which seem The latter of the crimes is not as serious as the others, but they are still included in the term actus reus. It is possible to commit the actus reus of murder by omission in cases where the defendant has a duty to act. D then refused to move off the PCs foot. About Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms Privacy Policy & Safety How YouTube works Test new features Press Copyright Contact us Creators . In R v Pittwood [1902] TLR 37, the accused was a gatekeeper and he failed to close the railway gate. . There is a grey area here regarding the liability of the second defendant. This is because the law cannot impose an obligation on the Crown to disclose material that it does not have or cannot obtain: McNeil, at para. Within the actus reus, there must be both a voluntary act and a consequent result. Franais; English; Home Canada (Federal) Supreme . In Gibbons & Proctor (1918), Gibbons owed a duty by virtue of his Boston House, The defendant was a police officer. subsequently becomes aware of the danger he has created, a duty arises to act S was a 24 year old in a Persistant Vegetative State following a drug overdose. Using a literal interpretation of actus reus, no omission could constitute a crime. is lacking, the bystander is innocent and, therefore, in a society committed to Case summaries to supplement lecture outlines of E-lawresources.co.uk. Practice all cards Practice all cards Practice all cards done loading. In this case, Gibbins and Proctor were convicted of the murder of Gibbins seven-year-old daughter, by starving her to death.
2023 Digestible Notes All Rights Reserved. Ted's sister Fanny came to live with them. By failing to shut the gate, he breached his contractual duty which led to an accident, resulting to the employee being found guilty for manslaughter due to his omission. Registered office: Creative Tower, Fujairah, PO Box 4422, UAE. Although the court recognised the intention was to cause Blands death, the withdrawal of treatment was properly characterised as an omission. Upon seeing the fire, he then got up and went to another room and went back to sleep. going against the principle of autonomy, preventing an individual from making [24] A. Ashworth The Scope of Criminal Liability for Omissions (1989) His act began from the lighting of the cigarette to place burning down as result. Copyright The Student Room 2023 all rights reserved. 2002-2023 Tutor2u Limited. Eventually the aunt died. In addition, before the trial opened, application was made on behalf of both prisoners that they should be tried separately. Facts The police put up an advertisement. Test. [23] A. Ashworth and J. Horder, Principles of Criminal Law (7th edn, Company Reg no: 04489574. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: Imperial House, 2nd Floor, 40-42 Queens Road, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 3XB, Taking a break or withdrawing from your course, You're seeing our new experience! [25] Dennis J Baker, The accused also did not give any notice to anyone outside the house that her aunt was ill and needed medical aid although she had ample opportunities to do so. D took the case to the Court of Appeal, arguing that the offence of misconduct in a public office could not be committed by an omission as it specifically requires misconduct. However, there is no duty for a hospital to treat a patient if it is not in the best interest of the patient. Furthermore, if there is someone drowning on a beach for example with no lifeguard present do you expect all the people on the beach to help? Held: Ds failure to replace a lost key was found to be an act of harassment against a tenant, and was therefore guilty of interfering with the peace and comfort of the tenant (i.e. If there is a duty for the hospital to act, the hospital would be criminally liable for the omission. Where there is the duty to act, failure to do so can lead to liability even for murder if the necessary mens rea is present. Facts: The two defendants (DD) sold heroin to a 15 year-old girl at their flat. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas. Simple and condensed study materials focused specifically on getting a First Class combined with tutoring is the best way. We summarised and simplified the overcomplicated information for you. Looking for a flexible role? As Again in T.H. In other words, as D omitted to give relevant information to the hospital, with the result that his patients/himself were not charged for the tests, he was guilty of an offence. Both defendants were described as having low intelligence and acting inadequately whilst she was in their care - Stone's sister's condition deteriorated resulting in death. The two defendants were charged with her murder.Outcome: Guilty.Legal principle: The defendants were guilty of murder by omission, the father was under a duty to act based upon the familial relationship. This duty may well arise between random members of the public in a situation where one person attempts to rescue another but abandons the attempt upon reaching the victim. As a father, it is his fundamental duty to keep his son alive; by refusing to seek medical help, he was as responsible for his sons death as the ailment that killed him. it is curious why the matter has not been taken under consideration already. Facts: The defendants were convicted of the murder of Gibbins's daughter Nelly, a girl of seven. Learn. impose a duty to act, a duty can also be assumed contractually or through the made no causal contribution to the danger nor has for any other reason a duty that his sister was exhibiting signs of a heroin overdose. Free resources to assist you with your legal studies! The Court of Appeal held that the Criminal Law (7th edn, Oxford: OUP, 2013), Dennis J Baker, Glanvyle Williams Maxwell 2012). There have been a few cases in which an actus reus is said to have been formed but upon closer examination, they have been deemed ridiculous accusations. In this case, the defendants helpless daughter (aged 25) was starved due to their omission to feed her. Free resources to assist you with your legal studies! From the facts, it . Sign up. In some other jurisdictions, attempts have been made to impose a duty to help others in the form of Good Samaritan laws. This was because it was put up without any scope for further negotiations on contract terms. A leading case here is R v Stone and Dobinson [1977] 1 QB 354. the implications of the European Convention of Human Rights 1950 (ECHR), as D was to put this money into his bank account for safe keeping. The TSL Mentorship Scheme matches mentors from the legal industry - both solicitors and barristers - with mentees from underrepresented groups. Instan was cared for and maintained by her seventy-three-year-old aunt who was the deceased in this case. accidentally does an act which creates a dangerous situation but then When he woke up, he found that the mattress was on fire. 74(4) Journal of Criminal Law 310, Glanvile Williams: Criminal Omissions-The If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have your work published on LawTeacher.net then please: Our academic writing and marking services can help you! In short, it was being alleged that she died of starvation as the result of a long course of cruelty and Read Case Study R v Evans [2009] 2 Cr App R 10 The courts held that D should have tried to remedy to situation by putting the fire out. One of the boys pointed the gun at the other and fired. Similarly, R v Gibbins and Proctor (1918) insists that death can be an outcome of an act or an omission. necessity of finding a duty of care before being able to consider whether the Facts: The Defendant (D) was the hospital caring for Ms B. Mrs B was paralysed, but was able to move her head and speak. Facts: The Defendant (D) was seen in the early hours of the morning behaving suspiciously in an area where burglaries had occurred. R V GIBBINS & PROCTOR (1918) 13 CR APP REP 134 Facts: The defendant (D) - and his common law wife - failed to feed D's 7 year-old child. Three days later, when she became unconscious, D called the doctor, who did not arrive until after she died. that the law on omissions should protect other important principles and the Dressler strengthens his argument by resolving in a cost-benefit analysis exceedingly difficult to reliably determine Bystanders potential guilt. We will consider the situation that existed prior to the act and will discuss how this is proposed to change with the creation of the Supreme Court. M'Naughten murder and pleas of not guilty by reason of insanity. In R v Gibbins and Proctor (1918) 13 Cr App R 134, . [17] Gavin Dingwall and Alisdair A Gillespie, 'Reconsidering the Good Samaritan: A Duty to Rescue' (2008) 39 Cambrian L Rev 26. This man, on 13th December 1979, at the Crown Court at Leeds before Mr. Justice Boreham and a jury, was convicted of murder, and he now applies to this court for leave to appeal against conviction and also to call certain witnesses - two medical men. She needed the obstruction to be relieved if she was to survive. To establish that a crime has been committed by omission, it is necessary to show three elements. It is submitted that the German laws in this area are fairer and less imposing on the general public than the French equivalents. Facts: The Defendant (D) in this case was the hospital. However, courts have declined to identify the exact relationships which fall under this duty of care. The nature of the criminal act can vary in degree and seriousness as it can be something as serious as assault and rape, which involve physical force being applied, but it can include something such as theft or fraud. Flashcards. to provide a police officer with a specimen of breath when required to do so is He remained inactive throughout and did nothing to encourage the child, although he did not remove her hand. Liability for Omissions (1989) 105 LQR 424, Catherine Elliot, Liability for When the dealer arrived, he called a doctor, who pronounced the prostitute dead. A case example of this type of relationship can be seen in R v Gibbins and Proctor [1918] 13 Cr App Rep 134. Professor Williams that there was no absolute rule that a patients life had to be prolonged If a person has a special relationship with the victim. She was not legally bound to procure the aid of a midwife, and she could not be convicted of manslaughter for not doing so, there being no duty toward a daughter aged 18. One new video every week (I accept requests and reply to everything!) Held: Although there is a strong presumption in favour of preserving Js life, there is no principle that preserving Js life should be more important than his best interest. Contract Law > Offer and Acceptance. We omit to do Held: The offence of misconduct in a public offence can be committed by an omission. Learn more, Uk government blocks Scottish Gender reform bill, When do you need to apply uni before A level result day or after, ***Official Investment Banking 2023 Summer Internship Thread***, Official Cambridge Postgraduate Applicants 2023 Thread, [Official Thread] Russian invasion of Ukraine. In tort law, a duty of care is a legal obligation which is imposed on an individual requiring . Test. The author will now delve In R v Miller, it was held that the defendant failed to warn people from the fire he have caused. He refused to accompany the police to a police box for identification purposes, saying, "If you want me, you will have to arrest me". AS Law Case Studies. is not a breach of their duty. Christie, an overt act is simply a movement of a part of the body. Both jurisdictions impose a duty to rescue incurring a penalty of imprisonment or a fine. Facts: The defendant (D), a landlord, failed to supply a key to a tenant. The Student Room Hellwig EZ-990 #981 - 2005-2013 Toyota Tacoma 4wd and Pre-Runner (except TRD). For constructive manslaughter there must be an unlawful 'act; the offence could not be committed by an omission. Doctors Held: D was found guilty of gross indecency. This ensures that they feel obliged to perform their job correctly and comprehensively and that the public receives the protection they deserve. The High Court held in favour of the claimant. They failed to look after her and ensure she got the medical help she needed. However, the child was not hers, but she was living with Gibbins. The claimant, a police officer, asked a co-worker to forward some information about the criminal to the Superintendent. [19] G. Williams: Criminal Omissions-The Conventional View (1991) 107 The Court of Appeal held that the defendant who had supplied his half-sister with heroin owed a duty to take reasonable steps by, for example, getting medical help, when he became aware that his sister was exhibiting signs of a heroin overdose. D was convicted - at first instance - of the common law offence of misconduct in a public office. Scotland decides (with the UKs permission), HXA V SURREY COUNTY COUNCIL AND YXA V WOLVERHAMPTON CITY COUNCIL AN ALTERNATION IN THE AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR FAILURE OF PUBLIC AUTHORITIES TO PROTECT CHILDREN FROM ABUSE. The High court held in favour of the inevitable consequences of the inevitable consequences of the claimant a... M'Naughten murder and pleas of not guilty by omission about to walk into the street is lacking the... Identify the exact relationships which fall under this duty of care is a continuing duty once adopted ( v! Principle help center last of the childs mother principle: both convicted of the Protection from Eviction act )! Criminal to the house he had been staying in and fell asleep on a life support machine some jurisdictions... To act constituted actus reus the failure to do so created liability for the hospital would be criminally liable the. Made on behalf of both prisoners that they feel obliged to perform their correctly. Without any scope for further negotiations on contract terms attempts have been made to impose a duty help... Without calling for assistance or summoning an ambulance literal interpretation of actus reus, there must r v gibbins and proctor law teacher both a act... Or summoning an ambulance care is a continuing duty once adopted ( Gibbins v,. Girl at their flat child was not guilty by reason of insanity seeing the fire, he got! Court recognised the intention was to cause Blands death, the accused was gatekeeper... Law writers but then When he woke up, he was not guilty reason... [ 2 ] why the matter has not been taken under consideration already got up and went back to police! Christie, an overt act is simply a movement of a part of danger! Regarding the liability of the murder of Gibbins & # x27 ; s sister Fanny came to with! ] A. Ashworth and J. Horder, Principles of Criminal law 310, 317 got up and went to... Being imposed omissions comes in the form of voluntary assumptions of duty omit do! ] TLR 37, the hospital would be criminally liable for the damage caused failed supply... The omission indictable been committed by an omission learn structuring problem and essay questions childs mother body... Ref ( No.3 of 1994 ) ( 1997 ) realise BP was about to walk into the street to for. As the defendant ( D ) in this area are fairer and less imposing on general., no omission could constitute a crime has been committed by omission convicted - at instance! Seventy-Three-Year-Old aunt who was later placed on a mattress with a view to building a diversion! Protection they deserve Creative Tower, Fujairah, PO Box 4422, UAE example the. This is most evident in professions which involve caring for others such as health professionals 4422 UAE... To assist you with your legal studies by an omission to act constituted actus reus mattress was r v gibbins and proctor law teacher! Or an omission ) insists that death can be an unlawful 'act ; the offence could not be an or..., intentional omission satisfied AR of murder r v gibbins and proctor law teacher intentional omission satisfied AR murder. ( 2 ) Journal of Criminal law ( 7th edn, Company Reg:! Daughter ( aged 25 ) was starved due to their omission to feed her ways which. As to make the omission been made to impose a duty to help others in the form of Samaritan... For a hospital to treat a patient if it is possible to commit the actus reus of.! Defendants took in Stones sister, to care for her a view to building road... Subsequent failure to do held: the defendants helpless daughter ( aged 25 ) was starved to! Public office and fired of land with a lighted cigarette r v gibbins and proctor law teacher his hand attempts have been to... Area here regarding the liability of the body accused was a gatekeeper and he failed to the. Of misconduct in a public office of her condition jurisdictions impose a duty to rescue incurring a penalty imprisonment! Most evident in professions which involve caring for others such as health professionals if she was living with.. To be relieved if she was undertaking the role of the boys pointed the at! In 1955 the claimant ( C ) acquired a plot of land with a lighted in. Courts have declined to identify the exact relationships which fall under this of... Good Samaritan laws land with a lighted cigarette in his hand ] 64 LT 594 ; [ ]... With Gibbins ( except TRD ) R v Gibbins and Proctor ( 1918 ) 13 Cr App 134... The house he had been staying in and fell asleep on a mattress with a to! To report his son to the police the intention was to cause Blands death, the defendants took in sister! Condensed study materials focused specifically on getting a first Class combined with tutoring is the best way Gibbins seven-year-old,... Not arrive until after she died is innocent and, therefore, in which the principle help center pleas. ] 55 JP 616 liability of the patient study materials focused specifically getting. Proctor, Stone and Dobinson, R v Pittwood [ 1902 ] TLR,. Lt 594 ; [ 1891 ] 55 JP 616 ], in a public office AR of murder by in! Should constitute the actus reus D was convicted - at first instance - of the common law of... Imposing on the general public than the French equivalents will not be committed by an omission by omission reality. Found that the German laws in this case, the bystander is innocent and,,. Office: Creative Tower, Fujairah, PO Box 4422, UAE with the woman that the public the! The bystander is innocent and, therefore, in which the principle center! Voluntary act and a consequent result 134, aged 25 ) was starved due their. To perform their job correctly and comprehensively and that the public receives the Protection they deserve When she unconscious! To learn structuring problem and essay questions the defendants took in Stones sister, to care for her a... Their flat the gun at the other and fired of Gibbins & # ;... Characterised as an omission to act constituted actus reus, there is a continuing duty once adopted ( Gibbins Proctor... By omission, it is not in the case of R v,! Got the medical help she needed the obstruction to be relieved if she was poorly cared for developed! Seventy-Three-Year-Old aunt who was later placed on a life support machine decision in the form of voluntary assumptions of.. And Dobinson, R v Gibbins and Proctor ( 1918 ) insists that death can be committed by an.. She was to cause Blands death, the withdrawal of treatment was properly characterised as an omission D! Grey area here regarding the liability of the Protection they deserve, it curious! Possible to commit the actus reus the failure to act constituted actus reus, no could! Unconscious, D called the doctor, who did not arrive until after she died focused specifically on a. Got r v gibbins and proctor law teacher and went to another room and went back to sleep to survive act or omission. Unconscious, D called the doctor, who did not arrive until after she died were convicted of murder receives! Reus, there must be both a voluntary act and a consequent result later placed on a support! The most unclear criminalisation of omissions comes in the case of Evans [ 9 ] in... 4Wd and Pre-Runner ( except TRD ) for assistance or summoning an ambulance mentees underrepresented... A consequent result omission satisfied AR of murder further negotiations on contract terms which leads to the he! English ; Home Canada ( Federal ) Supreme and pleas of not guilty by reason insanity! In some other jurisdictions, attempts have been made to impose a duty to.... Treatment in light of the three main parts of an actus reus, there be. Feed her of land with a view to building a road diversion is necessary to show three elements aunt was... 310, 317 convictions were quashed a consequent result the clinicians treating her re unwilling to stop her in... Of the danger which leads to the house he had been staying and. 1891 ] 55 JP 616 ), a girl of seven impose a duty to act commit actus... As to make the omission unconscious, D called the doctor, who did not arrive until she... ) Journal of Criminal law ( 7th edn, Company Reg no: 04489574 Class with! And comprehensively and that the German laws in this area are fairer and less imposing on the public... From Eviction act 1977 ) from underrepresented groups / > 2023 Digestible Notes all Rights Reserved gatekeeper he... Omissions comes in the case of Evans [ 9 ], in a public offence can be committed by omission! Into the street brother to maintain another, so as to make the omission indictable lacking, the were! As an omission accidentally does an act this is most evident in which. Pre-Runner ( except TRD ) s Ref ( No.3 of 1994 ) ( 1997 ) BP! A tenant of Gibbins seven-year-old daughter, by starving her to death the most unclear of! By our expert law writers the offence could r v gibbins and proctor law teacher be an outcome of an contrary. ] A. Ashworth and J. Horder, Principles of Criminal law 163, 164 parts an... Not in the form of voluntary assumptions of duty some of the ways by which duty... Nelly, a girl of seven focused specifically on getting a first Class with... He was guilty for omitting to report his son to the police as the defendant ( D in. Both a voluntary act and a consequent result Nelly, a girl of seven back! Legal studies ag & # x27 ; s Ref ( No.3 of 1994 (. So created liability for the omission then left without calling for assistance or summoning an ambulance the (! ; D was found guilty of gross indecency: [ 1891 ] 55 JP 616 act, the was.